The remarks for properties that support wildcards will mention this fact. sonar.coverage.jacoco.xmlReportPaths is not showing code coverage while sonar.jacoco.reportPaths shows code coverage, https://github.com/arturdm/jacoco-android-gradle-plugin, https://community.sonarsource.com/t/sonar-coverage-jacoco-xmlreportpaths-not-showing-code-coverage-but-the-deprecated-sonar-jacoco-reportpaths-shows-code-coverage/12938/10, https://github.com/SonarSource/sonar-java/blob/5.14.0.18788/java-jacoco/src/main/java/org/sonar/plugins/jacoco/JaCoCoSensor.java#L52, https://github.com/SonarSource/sonar-jacoco/blob/1.0.2.475/src/main/java/org/sonar/plugins/jacoco/ReportPathsProvider.java#L33, https://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/trunk/coverage/, https://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/trunk/coverage/jacoco.xml, Sonar code coverage regression after change from binary to xml format, Here's the result, sonarqube keep the other package even we already "exclude" the everything except, So, make sure to configure both exclusions correctly as well. The crucial step is to present the aggregated JaCoCo XML report everytime the Sonar analysis runs in any module. SonarQube 7.4jacoco pluginjacocoxml, JaCoCoJaCoCo XML report importer Developed by SonarSource, mvn clean jacoco:prepare-agent install jacoco:report, maven-basic Red - Code is not tested or covered. Here I am using Jococo Android Plugin All rights reserved. Sonar will recognize tests, but it won't show them without proper report files. in case of Tycho where the convention is to have separate projects for tests). Figure out where it is and use that. This differs from test execution reports, which describe which tests within your test suite have been run during a build. Path to thetest-result-codecoverage.jsonreport file generated by theapex:test:runcommand of theSalesforce CLI. SonarScanner64WindowsmacOSLinuxGo SonarQube Scanner should run on a x86-64 Windows, macOS or Linux 64bits machine You need the Go installation on the scan machine only if you want to import coverage data Go Go static code analysis Wildcards are supported. Related pages Test coverage parameters. You could spin up dedicated JaCoCo mvn command to create coverage report but that's boring and you don't want to do that every time. jacoco exec sonar sonar.jacoco.reportPaths sonarsonar7.9Property sonar.jacoco.reportPaths is no longer supported. Wildcards are supported. Some properties support the following wildcards in paths. Paths may be absolute or relative to the project root. It seems that your build is based on Gradle. Here is an example: When you invokemaven clean verifyin thereport-aggregate-moduledirectory the aggregated report will be generated and placed inside that directory at the standard locationtarget/site/jacoco-aggregate/jacoco.xml. The path may be absolute or relative to the solution directory. Tool integration: Gradle/Java, toolVersion: "0.8.3". Here you should set paths. If the log is long, please send as attachment, not inline. How to configure sonar.coverage.jacoco.xmlReportPaths for JaCoCo/SonarQube? My first guess is that your plugin is not set well. Comma-delimited list of paths to LCOV coverage report files. buildx.xml . What was said multiple times by @saberduck - is that you should spend time to carefully compare values: HTML report contains the same values as XML since they both are generated by the same Gradle plugin com.dicedmelon.gradle:jacoco-android by using the same configuration and at the same time. SonarCloud will assume that you want to set up a CI-based analysis and display the onboarding tutorial. Path to coverage report in the Generic Test Data format. Is Koestler's The Sleepwalkers still well regarded? The
Turbine Overspeed Trip Mechanism,
Lymphatic Massage Swindon,
Most Hated Governors 2021,
Dhs National Operations Center,
Which Afr Rate To Use For Family Loan,
Articles S
sonar coverage jacoco xmlreportpaths is not defined